Association between ABO blood groups and risk of coronavirus disease 2019: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has threatened millions of people worldwide. Growing evidence suggests that the ABO blood type contributed to the susceptibility of COVID-19, but the results are controversial. The major objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis study is to investigate the impact of ABO blood group on COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Two independent reviewers searches the databases of the China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang Database, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from the date of conception to June 30, 2020. We will manually search for gray literature, such as meeting records and dissertations. Two independent reviewers will screen studies that meet the criteria, extract data, statistical data, and assess the risk of bias. The dichotomous variable will calculate the odds ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity between included studies will be assessed by heterogeneity χ tests and I index. The forest plots will be used to describe the pooled results. The Begg rank correlation test or Egger linear regression test will be performed to quantize the publication bias. DISCUSSION: This study will provide high-quality evidence to evaluate the contribution of the ABO blood group in COVID-19 pneumonia infection. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020195615.

Efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen in the treatment of patients with moderate COVID-19 infection: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

BACKGROUND: As of June 2020, more than 7 million cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) have been reported worldwide. At present, there is no vaccine or antiviral for the novel coronavirus pneumonia. Lianhua Qingwen (LQ), a Chinese medicine formula, has been authorized by the Chinese government for treating COVID-2019. This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the efficacy and safety of LQ on patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Two independent reviewers will search the following databases of the China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Periodical Database, Wanfang database, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from the date of conception to June 1, 2020. We will use the MeSH/Emtree terms, combining free-text words that were properly adjusted for the different databases in all of the search strategies. We will take primary clinical symptoms, total efficacy, and adverse event into consideration for our primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes, we will estimate the chest computed tomography manifestations, the rate of conversion to severe cases, and secondary clinical symptoms. We will evaluate the quality of including studies through the risk of bias assessment tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Fixed-or random-effect model will be utilized to calculate the overall pooled risk estimates. Forest plots will be generated to prove the pooled results. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out to identify sources of heterogeneity. The Begg rank correlation test and Egger linear regression test will be used to explore publication bias. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will compare the primary and secondary outcomes at baseline and endpoint in the treatment and control groups to investigate the efficacy and safety of LQ for treatment COVID-2019. DISCUSSION: Data from this study will provide strong evidence for clinical decision if the findings are positive.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020190757.